The terrible injustice and cowardice of the Judge, in front of the arrogance of the aponent's Lawyer, who was able to intimidate the judge by appealing the decision, shouted at the judge. The judge does not think about making a FAIR decision. The judge is thinking about how to make a decision that is CONVENIENT for her career, so that there are fewer appeals. Shame on you … You can't take a job like this because you're cowardly.… The judge during the trial shared her personal information - that she was late for home and needed to pick up the child from kindergarten, called her husband… Aponent's scandalous lawyer was able to use all this as leverage. That's why a judge puts on a robe - to be NOT a WOMAN, but a Judge. And leave everything personal at the door. Briefly about the case - the house has 2 owners, MO. Owner A, permanently resided in another city. Coming every 2 years. Owner B has a residence permit in the Russian Federation and also does not live permanently in the house. Owner B starts changing some locks without warning A. Owner A notices the replacement and asks for the keys. Owner B denies replacement (recorded in telephone correspondence) Owner A notifies that then the locks will have to be replaced and after that Owner A is ready to transfer the new set to owner B. All agree. The owner came to the house. The parents of owner B were there (registered in another village) The owner made a planned change of those locks to which he did not have access. The replaced locks were not the main and only ones. These locks were the second ones on the doors (spare) and were not closed by owner A and owner B. Thus, the owner B was not deprived by owner A of the opportunity to get into the house. Owner A asked the parents of owner B when he plans to come from the Russian Federation and will be in the house? To transfer keys ( recorded on video). The parents of owner B said that owner B would contact owner A by phone when he arrived. Owner B - after learning from his parents about the change of locks. Relative B, being in the Russian Federation and not coming to the Republic of Belarus, files a LAWSUIT - stating that he cannot get into the house and Relative A does not give the keys.... At the same time, the owner of B pretends that he does NOT KNOW that Relative A is ready to give him the keys. Partner B, does not request keys from partner A. Owner B does not send his representative to the owner A to receive the keys ( to the house ). The owner is in the house all the time And I'm ready to hand over the keys, on demand. But there is no one to hand over the keys to, since brother-in-law B is in the Russian Federation, on a residence permit, pays taxes in the Russian Federation and maintains an individual entrepreneur there. And the COURT will satisfy this claim..... The trial takes place in several sessions - about 4-5. The defendant (his colleague A) bears the costs of a lawyer. And no one compensates for it. A STUPID and unfair precedent has been created - now ALL joint owners, without allocated ownership shares, can file lawsuits, simply because THEY WANTED TO, without grounds. I will not specify the judge's last name, the Chairman of the Minsk Regional Court and the relevant persons can easily find out for themselves.

See original · Русский

Андрей Бирюков

Level 4 Local Expert

You are a lousy court, I wish everyone to file a complaint against you to the Supreme Court and the administration.The president's judges do not work there, the assistant judges are not competent staff.It's humiliating to be so illiterate.

See original · Русский

елена р.

Level 3 Local Expert

I thank Judge Guryeva for her attitude. After the hearing, I wanted to live.May God grant you good health.I wish there were more people like you and the prosecutor, but I don't know your last name.

See original · Русский